All I can say about Montalvan is the delivery of their advocates is well explain by the combination of Robert Malthus theory about Anti-Life and Anti-Family advocates. By Robert Malthus he explain that about how can we control population growth of our country, so that our economy here would became productive and to be successful. Moreover, in the basis of his arguments is that belief that a decline in population means economic growth and development. Robert Malthus was men who introduce the whole concern of our country. What would be happen if the population continues increasing?
In his theory, Robert Malthus said that the population growth geometrically and the food production grows arithmetically. The more population growth the more lack of food supply must be provided for many people. He said also that the one of the very controversial economy of the country is human resources; it is he reason why the countries are successful. As if the government of
Here in
1 comment:
The montalvan article helps us to know the important details about youth, family and to our economy because it is referring to the anti-life and anti- family advocates.The various concerns of this advocates is consolidated into an omnibus law covering rreproductive health, population policy,two-child policy and sex education for the youth.I also agreed,to include the senate bills 319 to address women's health becausethis bills seeks to ban abortive drugs and device.The Malthus proposal was very important to our economy because he introducing about pessimistic principle that foresaw the world's population out running food suply, leading to decrease food per percent and to check population growth he make others solutions, what we called"Moral restraint and vice" this population control strategy called for the late marriage and sexual abstinence but it is also advocated infanticide, murder contraception and homosexuality and that is the problem of our economy and government now. I also agreed the malthus proposal because this proposal their solutions would apply only to the poor and working classes but I did not agreed to those who ignore for the fact that malthus himself, even as he pressed for population control, stated that we cannot denigrates man's capacity to increase food supply. In the Phils, anti-life advocates there clearly a colonial agenda these agenda-makers may not be obtrusive with their presence.For me, it is also possible that some advocates are aware of them but I won't be surprise in the shadows such anti-life giant octuposes as Planned Parenthood, whose tentacles may have spread far and wide to influence Phil.legislative efforts.I agreed that population control is simply not the solution to poverty.Despite the population decline, however, poverty incidence has not been reduce significantly.The very important that we also know is that "why is population in our community now is increasing" through this proposing bills we can catch up to the problem about increasing population and the proposed bills are premised on the belief that we are poor because we are too many.Fewer births may (or may not) mean less expense for a family, depending on its priorities and less births means less people for the labor force in the next twenty years.Higher population densities do not necessarily translate into lower personal income.
Post a Comment