I agree,because we must concern with the law covering in our country like reproductive health, population policy, two child policy and sex education for the youth. And to the promoting of women's health.
The worlds population are out running food supply and leading to decrease food per person. this population control strategy called for the late marriage and sexual abstinence, and only apply to the poor and working classes would assume social responsibility for societal ills. Even if we are in a population control we cannot denigrate man's capacity to increase food supply.
Population control is simply not the solution to poverty, poverty has not been reduce curbing graft and corruption as the people do. we are poor because we are too many.
We must stop reproductive health includes abortion. >Dotolio, Hannah Lou
Sunday, August 17, 2008
Malthus Theory
I also agree to Malthus Theory that we will have birth control especially in the Philippines because Philippines is one of the most populated country in Asia.
As we see now a days, Philippines is facing economic crisis so it is important to educate the people about sex to let them know the advantages and the disadvantages it brings. Because if we will not educate them especially the teenagers, they will not know how to face the problem of getting pregnant at early ages and if this will happen, they can not support the daily needs of their children because they don't have jobs and they are still relying on to their parents and how can they buy the needs of their children if the foods and other products are very expensive! Yet, still we
have to promote Family Planning or Two Child Policy and we have to face reality that we have economic crisis because of our corrupt leaders.
by: Michellyn Jean C. Cababat
As we see now a days, Philippines is facing economic crisis so it is important to educate the people about sex to let them know the advantages and the disadvantages it brings. Because if we will not educate them especially the teenagers, they will not know how to face the problem of getting pregnant at early ages and if this will happen, they can not support the daily needs of their children because they don't have jobs and they are still relying on to their parents and how can they buy the needs of their children if the foods and other products are very expensive! Yet, still we
have to promote Family Planning or Two Child Policy and we have to face reality that we have economic crisis because of our corrupt leaders.
by: Michellyn Jean C. Cababat
Thursday, August 14, 2008
malthus theory
I agree to the Malthus theory because I believe that using contraceptives is a very practical about the discussion of rapid population growth. It discuss about the problems regarding to our nations and it is related to population growth because of this it can affect to our nation regarding about economic problem that we can encounter today. Base on our economic issues it can cause crisis and became poor. Two child policy, some countries have this rules because they want the parents to become responsible and to have a better life or what we called Family Planning but in this case some other country have shorten workers because of this policy so in Economic point of view some industry hired other workers in other country.
I also agree with sex education because it helps us especially teenagers not to be ignorant about sex. It helps us to control and know our limitations. It teaches us the advantages and disadvantages of sex and to make us be aware. Late marriage has good and bad effects. The good effects is that it can help on birth control, on the side the woman’s life will be in danger and there would be a possibility that she will not be able to deliver well the baby.
Malthus Theory has the potential to our Economic because it tackles about the main problem in our country like population growth, two child policy, Family Planning and Sex Education. Malthus is very concern about the status of our economy. Malthus want the people to become productive responsible and a concern in Economy.
Carl Joy O. Fabroa
IV-Maawain
I also agree with sex education because it helps us especially teenagers not to be ignorant about sex. It helps us to control and know our limitations. It teaches us the advantages and disadvantages of sex and to make us be aware. Late marriage has good and bad effects. The good effects is that it can help on birth control, on the side the woman’s life will be in danger and there would be a possibility that she will not be able to deliver well the baby.
Malthus Theory has the potential to our Economic because it tackles about the main problem in our country like population growth, two child policy, Family Planning and Sex Education. Malthus is very concern about the status of our economy. Malthus want the people to become productive responsible and a concern in Economy.
Carl Joy O. Fabroa
IV-Maawain
Monday, August 11, 2008
population decline is not necessary the answer on why we're struggling in poverty now.why cant they decline graft and corruption instead??that would be a good start.but can we trust our leaders to cooperate??no, of course!their too busy putting up their greedy intentions into action.
This article by Antonio Montalvan simply presents its strong stand against Malthus theory and the very hot issues of the Philippine government on anti-life and anti-family bills.And I stood against Montalvan's principle and wanted to dispute and rebut about it. Yah, there are still other factors to be seen, but at large, population is dragging the country's economy.
Yes! I attest to the line, "The proposed bills are premised on the belief that we are poor because we are too many." And many of those who have more number of children are those under the low class. See! No matter how will you educate these group of people, like the natives, the "badjaos" and the other very least class in level --- they will not go for that.I understand this point, "Fewer births may (or may not) mean less expense for a family, depending on its priorities. What is certain however, is that less births means less people for the labor force in the next 20 years. Higher population densities do not necessarily translate into lower personal income". But, I strongly dropped this explanation! Why? What can you expect from a group of people having more numbers of children without quality input of resources? Our country is not charting of producing low-performing individuals. What can you expect from the "badjaos" flooding the streets? What can you gain from the narrow-minded of most "natives"?I strongly disagree with Montalvan's statement, "Population control is simply not the solution to poverty". I must stress and emphasize that population control is the solution to be saved from poverty and for the nation's economy be elevated.Come on, --- why look for other angles when we are obliged to solve this emerging chaos today! --- Population expolsion explodes like a bomb.Basically, how can a non-working couple having a least of five(5) children without income at all? How can we address basic needs for this? Then, how can situation like this help our country's economy?Let's focus on the fact about Family Income which includes primary income and receipts from other sources received by all family members during the calendar year, as paricipants in any economic activity or as recipients of transfers, pensions, grants, etc. (2000 FIES, NSO). So, what family income does the lower class of family have?Then, how can we coincide Montalvan's idea to this fact? In the Philippine official methodology, the poverty line may be viewed as the minimum income required to meet the food requirements and other non-food basic needs. (1997 Philippine Poverty Statistics, NSCB). How can basic needs be addressed effectively and efficiently, quality-wise if population floods out?Montalvan's insight is out of reality. We should deal with population control seriously otherwise we will be drowned by our own outputs of unhealthy and unwise decisions.
The Philippines is a democratic society through and through. As such, the citizens are allowed to do anything they want in their own rights which is not a violation of the law. The citizens are free to move on their own discretion, although one may argue that this is the reason why so many crimes are committed in the Philippines. Nonetheless, with the independence of the country came the independence of the people which earns high marks for the Philippines on this policy.
"Population Control is simply not the solution to poverty"
This article by Antonio Montalvan simply presents its strong stand against Malthus theory and the very hot issues of the Philippine government on anti-life and anti-family bills.And I stood against Montalvan's principle and wanted to dispute and rebut about it. Yah, there are still other factors to be seen, but at large, population is dragging the country's economy.
Yes! I attest to the line, "The proposed bills are premised on the belief that we are poor because we are too many." And many of those who have more number of children are those under the low class. See! No matter how will you educate these group of people, like the natives, the "badjaos" and the other very least class in level --- they will not go for that.I understand this point, "Fewer births may (or may not) mean less expense for a family, depending on its priorities. What is certain however, is that less births means less people for the labor force in the next 20 years. Higher population densities do not necessarily translate into lower personal income". But, I strongly dropped this explanation! Why? What can you expect from a group of people having more numbers of children without quality input of resources? Our country is not charting of producing low-performing individuals. What can you expect from the "badjaos" flooding the streets? What can you gain from the narrow-minded of most "natives"?I strongly disagree with Montalvan's statement, "Population control is simply not the solution to poverty". I must stress and emphasize that population control is the solution to be saved from poverty and for the nation's economy be elevated.Come on, --- why look for other angles when we are obliged to solve this emerging chaos today! --- Population expolsion explodes like a bomb.Basically, how can a non-working couple having a least of five(5) children without income at all? How can we address basic needs for this? Then, how can situation like this help our country's economy?Let's focus on the fact about Family Income which includes primary income and receipts from other sources received by all family members during the calendar year, as paricipants in any economic activity or as recipients of transfers, pensions, grants, etc. (2000 FIES, NSO). So, what family income does the lower class of family have?Then, how can we coincide Montalvan's idea to this fact? In the Philippine official methodology, the poverty line may be viewed as the minimum income required to meet the food requirements and other non-food basic needs. (1997 Philippine Poverty Statistics, NSCB). How can basic needs be addressed effectively and efficiently, quality-wise if population floods out?Montalvan's insight is out of reality. We should deal with population control seriously otherwise we will be drowned by our own outputs of unhealthy and unwise decisions.
The Philippines is a democratic society through and through. As such, the citizens are allowed to do anything they want in their own rights which is not a violation of the law. The citizens are free to move on their own discretion, although one may argue that this is the reason why so many crimes are committed in the Philippines. Nonetheless, with the independence of the country came the independence of the people which earns high marks for the Philippines on this policy.
"Population Control is simply not the solution to poverty"
Sunday, August 10, 2008
montalvan
A comment of Malthusian theory
If we base in economic point of view, Malthusian theory has a point. Because he wants to minimized the population in our country, so that our economy will rise and I agree in the sex education for the youth to be aware. But I disagree in the population policy and two child policy because if we have those policies, those are the reason why abortion in our country increases and in the eyes of god this is not right. Because abortion is a big sin.
If we base in economic point of view, Malthusian theory has a point. Because he wants to minimized the population in our country, so that our economy will rise and I agree in the sex education for the youth to be aware. But I disagree in the population policy and two child policy because if we have those policies, those are the reason why abortion in our country increases and in the eyes of god this is not right. Because abortion is a big sin.
The principle of Population
The article is all about the pricipleof population. One of Thomas Robert Malthus principle is the rather pessimistic principle that foresaw the world's population out running food supply, leading to decrease food per person. In this Malthus principle, I agree that if we think well of our mistakes we can do or decide wisely. If we just guess only it will lead to the down fall of our world's population and out running food supply, leading to the decrease food per person.The basis of their arguments is the mistaken belief that the lowering of population means economic growth and development. Declining or lowering of our population have an advantage and disadvantage, the advantage of declined population is that the people will not suffer poverty, the food supply is enough to provide us.Lowering of population does not mean economic growth and development. When the population is decreasing there's a tendency that our economic will fall. Like China, they have a rule in every family there is one child only or what we call "one child policy". The economic of China didn't develop, it's because of there is no person who can manage the development of their economy and also it's because of their rule, the "onechild policy".
Birth control can help us to develop our economy but not like the policy of China the "one child policy". It must be minimum of 2 children and maximum of 4 children per family.
Birth control can help us to develop our economy but not like the policy of China the "one child policy". It must be minimum of 2 children and maximum of 4 children per family.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)